Tartu comprehensive plan 2040+·Emajõgi walking and cycling bridges

Where should Tartu build its next walking and cycling bridge over the Emajõgi?

Report: Karlova sample journeys and detailed northwest analysis →

Five comprehensive-plan locations, each on its own

Bridge locationGainUsageSaving per bridge userAfter Tuglase

Entire urban stretch of the Emajõgi, every 100 m

Each bar is an automatically generated bridge at that river location, added to today’s network. Its height shows the gain in accessibility to everyday destinations across the city’s population.

All screening locations as a table
kmWalking %Cycling %Status

Costs and constraints

Two separate impact analyses

One, the other, or both

IndicatorT = Tuglase · M = Marja · TM = both

Added value of the second bridge

The share of the combined impact added when the second bridge is built after the first.

Sample journeys

Journey times and routes for eight address pairs today, with Tuglase, with Marja and with both bridges are on the .

Sensitivity

Sample journeys (minutes)

Hover over a row to see routes on the map. The dashed line shows today’s fastest route. Click to pin the selection and zoom to the journey; hover over a time column to highlight that alternative.

Karlova/Rebase ↔ Annelinn and Ihaste

Current = fastest route in today’s network. Sõpruse and Ihaste columns show routes via that specific bridge. With Rebase = fastest route after adding the new bridge; if no time is saved, the existing bridge remains in use.

JourneyCurrentSõpruse
via
Ihaste
via
Rebase
with bridge
Saving
min

Eight destination pairs recalculated on the OSM network, dated 2 October 2026. Walking 4.8 km/h; cycling 10–16 km/h by road type and 14 km/h on the new bridge. The Rebase alignment comes from citywide screening; bank connectors are hypothetical, with a 15% travel-time allowance on the bridge and connectors. Times are between network nodes; building access time and gradients are excluded. CSV · XLSX.

Northwest examples: Tuglase and Marja

JourneyCurrentTMTM

Eight address pairs from the original Overture screening. Times are between network nodes; building access segments (median ~20 m) are excluded and identical across scenarios. Green times are shorter than today. Identical routes are drawn only once on the map.

Sensitivity variant. The baseline uses a 10 min half-life and time thresholds of 15 min walking and 10 min cycling.

Layers
Basemap

Click a grid cell, bridge or screening location on the map for details.

Credits

Created with AI using the free tool OpenMapStack.

Analysis prepared: 2 October 2026, 18:11 UTC (run run-20261002-181138)

Author: Jaak Laineste, jaak.laineste@gmail.com

Report (Karlova journeys, northwest cost–benefit analysis, health and bike sharing): analuus.html

Question

Assumptions
Known limitations

Sources

Scenario additions

Workflow

Checks

Outputs